Wise v. United States Department of Agriculture

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Wise v. United States Department of Agriculture, 592 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2015)

Wise v. United States Department of Agriculture

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district court’s orders denying them motion for an eviden-tiary hearing and granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wise v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00234-BO, 2014 WL 5460606 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2014; Aug. 19, 2014). We grant Appellants leave to proceed in forma pau-peris but deny their other pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Eddie WISE Dorothy Monroe-Wise v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE James Davenport, Individually Mike Huskey, Individually Aaron A. Martin, Individually Juan M. Garcia, Individually Tom Vilsack, In his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture Paula F. Nicholls, Individually Debbie Houston, Individually Cynthia I. Kernodle, Individually Joe Leonard, In his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights of United States Department of Agriculture
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published