Smith v. Clontz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Smith v. Clontz, 592 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2015)

Smith v. Clontz

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Lawrence Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Clontz, No. 1:14-cv-00269-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. filed Oct. 20, 2014, entered Oct. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
James Lawrence SMITH v. Honorable Ed CLONTZ John Doe 1 John Doe 2 Jane Doe 1 Jane Doe 2 Martha Elizabeth Grist State of North Carolina
Status
Published