Rutledge v. Tessier
Rutledge v. Tessier
594 F. App'x 209
Rutledge v. Tessier
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rutledge v. Tessier, No. 2:13-cv-00470-DEM, 2014 WL 5422205 (E.D.Va. Oct. 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.