United States v. Riley
United States v. Riley
595 F. App'x 234
United States v. Riley
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr00101-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.