Penaloza v. Hubbert

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Penaloza v. Hubbert, 595 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2015)

Penaloza v. Hubbert

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Virgilio Penaloza appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd., 986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir. 1993) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Virgilio PENALOZA v. HUBBERT, Dr., Dentist at Piedmont Regional Jail, sued in personal capacity, GORDON, Doctor at Piedmont Regional Jail, sued in personal capacity
Status
Published