U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Yates v. Garrison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 27, 2015 · Duncan, Shedd, Thacker

599 F. App'x 523

Counsel

Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se. Richard Caldarone, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, United States Department of Justice, Washington D.C., for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Yates v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal the district court’s order de*524nying relief on their complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yates v. Garrison, No. 5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC, 2014 WL 6605484 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2014). We deny the Yateses’ motion to strike the informal response brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.