Hunt v. Grady
Hunt v. Grady
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael Eugene Hunt appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunt v. Grady, No. 5:12-cv-00144-RJC, 2014 WL 4829067 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29 & Oct. 27, 2014). Hunt’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.