U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Walton v. Riddick

Walton v. Riddick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 2, 2015 · Davis, Keenan, Wynn
605 F. App'x 191

Walton v. Riddick

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

■ PER CURIAM:

Brian L. Walton, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Walton’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Walton has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.