U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Copeland

United States v. Copeland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 2015 · Floyd, Gregory, Thacker
605 F. App'x 226

United States v. Copeland

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Michael Copeland appeals the district court’s order denying his fourth motion for transcripts at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Copeland, No. 1:08-cr-00082-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.