U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Miskell v. Rohrer

Miskell v. Rohrer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 22, 2015 · Agee, Duncan, Shedd
606 F. App'x 99

Miskell v. Rohrer

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Judy Kay Miskell appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to strike documents she filed in her closed case. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Miskell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Miskell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.