U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Fritz v. Akosomitas

Fritz v. Akosomitas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 24, 2015 · Davis, Motz, Wilkinson
610 F. App'x 268

Counsel

William Edward Fritz, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Lilley Jackson, Sandra J. Senn, Senn Legal, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Fritz v. Akosomitas

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this.circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Edward Fritz appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fritz v. Akosomitas, No. 2:13-cv-03532-RMG, 2015 WL 1346311 (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.