U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Ford v. Miles

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 24, 2015 · Davis, Motz, Wilkinson

610 F. App'x 271

Counsel

Raymond Alexander Ford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Lyn Rowling Warden, Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, Sands Anderson, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, PC, Staunton, Virginia; Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, Rawls, Mcnelis & Mitchell, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond A. Ford, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ford v. Miles, No. 2:11-cv-00636-RBS-LRL (E.D.Va. Feb. 27, 2014; Feb. 13, 2015; Mar. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.