U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 28, 2015 · Duncan, King, Niemeyer
610 F. App'x 323

United States v. Williams

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district court’s order, denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.