U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Richards v. Muse

Richards v. Muse
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 12, 2015 · Diaz, Keenan, Shedd
611 F. App'x 787

Richards v. Muse

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Richards appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment in Richards’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, we observe that Richards’ claims with respect to the application of Virginia’s three-strikes provision are time-barred, and that he has failed to sufficiently allege any related equal protection claims in his complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Richards v. Muse, No. l:13-cv-01472-CMH-JFA, 2015 WL 853886 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2015). . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.