U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 25, 2015 · Davis, Harris, Keenan
613 F. App'x 243

Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nashibkuma Patel appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint against 7-Eleven, Inc., and denying his oral motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 15(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-00664-GBL-TRJ (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con*244tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.