Magwood v. Haberstadt
Magwood v. Haberstadt
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Nathaniel Magwood appeals the district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Magwood v. Haberstadt, No. 2:14-cv-03972-DCN (D.S.C. May 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.