U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Goode

United States v. Goode
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 21, 2015 · Harris, King, Thacker
616 F. App'x 90

Counsel

Antonio Thomas Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Goode

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Thomas Goode appeals the district court’s order denying the second post-judgment motion Goode filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Goode’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Goode has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and' argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.