U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

In re Veney

In re Veney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 22, 2015 · Keenan, Motz, Thacker
621 F. App'x 191

In re Veney

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lemoyne Veney petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.