Ruhren v. Spittal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 23, 2015

Ruhren v. Spittal, 621 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ruhren 'appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. *220§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruhren v. Spittal, No. 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. May 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Joseph RUHREN v. Marcos SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police Luther, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C. Meletis, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C.
Status: Published