Henson v. Wilt
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
James A. Henson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his consolidated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) actions without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henson v. Wilt, Nos. 1:14-cv-03724-RDB; 1:14-cv-03825-RDB; 1:15-cv-00028-RDB (D.Md. Jan. 4, 2015). We deny Henson’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James A. HENSON, Jr. v. Bradley A. WILT Walter Iser Brian Iames T.L. Sires William E. Miller Robert M. Friend Dale Smith Sgt. Puffenberg Nicolas Soltas Steven J. Miller Shawn Murray Jesse L. Lambert P. Deist C.O. II Anderson B.E. Fann C.O. II Saville C.O. II Gilpen John Sindy Mr. Herbold Mr. Littier Mrs. Holwager C.O. II Walters M. Smith NP Janette Clark Rodney O. Likin Guards Jon Doe Richard Miller Richard S. Roderick William S. Bohrer Subordinates in HV 1@ NBCI, (HV 4@WCI) Robert M. Friend Frank B. Bishop. Jr. J. Philip Morgan, Sr.
- Status
- Published