Scott v. Young

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Scott v. Young, 622 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2015)

Scott v. Young

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joey Duane Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and certain nondispositive orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03159-FL (E.D.N.C. June 19, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014, Jan. 22, 2015; Apr. 15, 2015; May 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Joey Duane SCOTT v. Reuben Franklin YOUNG Robert C. Lewis Frank L. Perry Hattie Pimpong James M. Johnson
Status
Published