Potter v. Suntrust Bank

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Potter v. Suntrust Bank, 622 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2015)

Potter v. Suntrust Bank

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

D. Sidney Potter appeals the district court’s order dismissing this case under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v), 47(b) for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Potter’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Potter has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
D. Sidney POTTER v. SUNTRUST BANK Randstad US, L.P., and William Rogers Linda Galipeau Christine Miles Reginald Ford Margaret Slaughter Charmaine Surgeon Julie Hardy
Status
Published