Bridges v. Townsend
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
George Bridges, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bridges v. Townsend, No. 2:12-ev-00703-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. filed July 2, 2015, entered July 6, 2015). We- dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- George BRIDGES, Jr. v. Jerry R. TOWNSEND, Assistant Warden Eliza S. Willis, Treatment Program Supervisor M.K. Lefevers, NCC Unit Manager
- Status
- Published