Chin-Young v. Rowell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 30, 2015

Chin-Young v. Rowell, 623 F. App'x 121 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Chin-Young appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motions for reconsideration.*122* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Chin-Young v. Powell, No. 8:18-cv-03772-RWT (D.Md. Apr. 2, 2015; May 7, 2015; May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

We construe Chin-Young’s informal brief as a timely notice of appeal from the orders denying his motions for reconsideration. See Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49, 112 S.Ct. 678, 116 L.Ed.2d 678 (1992); Hughes v. Halifax Cnty. Sch. Bd., 823 F.2d 832, 834-35 (4th Cir. 1987).

Reference

Full Case Name: Christopher CHIN-YOUNG v. Gary L. ROWELL, Department of the Army Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General U.S. Attorney, of the United States William D. Spencer Kathleen D. Cole Denise S. Price Nicole Decrescenzo
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published