Clark v. County of Fairfax
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Eric S. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying his- motion for leave to amend the complaint, following the district court’s dismissal of Clark’s first complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and this Court’s affirmance of that order. See Clark v. Cnty. of Fairfax, 554 Fed.Appx. 171 (4th Cir. 2014) (No. 13-2101). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Eric S. CLARK v. The COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA Richard W. Nagel, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia R.L. Davis, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia John Spata, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia John H. Kim, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia T.B. Smith, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia S.N. Brim, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia Jonathan Stern, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia Kenneth Pfeiffer, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia Randall C. Hargus, Individually and in capacity as employee of Fairfax County, Virginia John Doe 1 John Doe 2 John Doe 3 John Doe 4 John Doe 5 John Doe 6 John Doe 7 John Doe 8 John Doe 9 John Doe 10 John Doe 11 John Doe 12 John Doe 13 John Doe 14 John Doe 15 John Doe 16 John Doe 17 John Doe 18 John Doe 19 John Doe 20 John Doe 21 John Doe 22 John Doe 23 John Doe 24 John Doe 25 John Doe 26 John Doe 27 John Doe 28 John Doe 29 John Doe 30
- Status
- Published