United States v. Chestnut

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Chestnut, 624 F. App'x 127 (4th Cir. 2015)

United States v. Chestnut

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

■ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
United States v. Raymond Edward CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray
Status
Published