U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Epps

United States v. Epps
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 4, 2015 · Agee, Davis, Motz
624 F. App'x 829

United States v. Epps

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hugh Epps appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Epps, No. 3:07-cr-00420-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. May 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.