U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Brown

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2015 · Diaz, Hamilton, Harris

627 F. App'x 218

Counsel

Jermaine Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine Elizabeth Wolfe, Office of the United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

*219Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Brown appeals from the district court’s orders construing his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on that basis, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, Nos. 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10; 4:13-cv-00041-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015; June 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.