U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Zulfiqar Kahn v. FedEx Office and Print Services

Zulfiqar Kahn v. FedEx Office and Print Services
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 13, 2016 · Duncan, Thacker, Harris
628 F. App'x 201

Zulfiqar Kahn v. FedEx Office and Print Services

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zulfiqar Kahn appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc., in his civil action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). As the district court ruled, Kahn failed to administratively exhaust his retaliation claim by properly raising it with the Equal Employment Op *202 portunity Commission. See Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Indus., Inc., 711 F.3d 401, 406-09 (4th Cir. 2013). The court correctly held that Kahn did not state a claim sufficient to withstand summary judgment on his claims of discrimination based on national origin and religion. His claims of procedural irregularities in the district court entitle him to no relief. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kahn v. FedEx Corporation, No. 1:14-cv-00561-GBL-IDD (E.D.Va. May 29,2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the deci-sional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.