United States v. Ted Robinson
United States v. Ted Robinson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-4385
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TED ROBINSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:13-cr-00629-HMH-1)
Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ted Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ted Robinson appeals his conviction for wire fraud under
18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1343 (2012). Robinson has received leave to
represent himself on appeal. We have reviewed Robinson’s
informal brief, and conclude that the claims therein are
meritless. We have reviewed the record and conclude that
Robinson’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. Accordingly,
we affirm. We deny Robinson’s motion for default judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished