Shirley Hirshauer v. Thomas Ross
Shirley Hirshauer v. Thomas Ross
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2109
SHIRLEY A. HIRSHAUER; JAMES A. GERBEN, JR.; RANDY W.
GERBEN; JASON W. GERBEN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. THOMAS G. ROSS, Judge; BROOKE SCHUMM, III; THE ESTATE OF GERALDINE GRAY; TERRY BRUMWELL; ALICE HALL; ELIZABETH O’SHEA; HONORABLE THOMAS G. ROSS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cv-00832-CCB)
Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shirley A. Hirshauer; James A. Gerben, Jr.; Randy W. Gerben; Jason W. Gerben, Appellants Pro Se. Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephan Young Brennan, ILIFF, MEREDITH, WILDBERGER & BRENNAN, P.C., Pasadena, Maryland; Brooke Schumm, III, DANEKER, MCINTIRE, SCHUMM, PRINCE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Shirley A. Hirshauer, James A. Gerben, Jr., Randy W.
Gerben, and Jason W. Gerben appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hirshauer v. Ross, No. 1:15-cv-00832-CCB (D. Md. Aug.
26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.