Rafael Romero v. Warden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Rafael Romero v. Warden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6961

RAFAEL ROMERO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00036-JFM)

Submitted: December 11, 2015 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rafael Romero, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rafael Romero seeks to appeal the district court’s decision

to return his motion for miscellaneous relief without docketing

it because the motion pertained to the filing fee in a case that

was closed in 2013. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2012).

The decision Romero seeks to appeal is not an appealable

judgment or order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished