Jerry Hurst v. Guy Harbert

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jerry Hurst v. Guy Harbert

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2000

JERRY A. HURST,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GUY HARBERT, in their individual and official capacities; MAXWELL WIEGARD, in their individual and official capacities; MARTY HARBIN, in their individual and official capacities; COLIN SHALK, in their individual and official capacities; NICHOLAS SKILES, in their individual and official capacities; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1-10,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:15-cv-00033-GEC)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jerry A. Hurst seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his complaint in which he sought to raise claims

under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012), the Driver’s Privacy Protection

Act,

28 U.S.C. §§ 2722

, 2724 (2012), and various state laws, and

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Hurst v. Harbert, No.

5:15-cv-00033-GEC (W.D. Va. June 3, 2015 & Aug. 3, 2015). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished