United States v. Ronnie Rainey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ronnie Rainey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7387

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONNIE D. RAINEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:10-cr-00199-D-1)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie D. Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley, Evan Rikhye, Assistant United States Attorneys, Shailika S. Kotiya, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie D. Rainey seeks to appeal district court’s order

granting his motion to appoint counsel and to conduct a

restitution hearing. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2012);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The order Rainey seeks to appeal

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished