United States v. Gregory Rutledge

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gregory Rutledge

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7365

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GREGORY GEORGE RUTLEDGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00321-LMB-1)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory George Rutledge, Appellant Pro Se. Jack Hanly, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory George Rutledge appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to terminate his supervised release judgement

under

18 U.S.C. § 3583

(e)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Rutledge, No. 1:04-cr-00321-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 12 &

entered Aug. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished