U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Gregory Rutledge

United States v. Gregory Rutledge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 2016

United States v. Gregory Rutledge

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7365

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GREGORY GEORGE RUTLEDGE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00321-LMB-1)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory George Rutledge, Appellant Pro Se. Jack Hanly, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Gregory George Rutledge appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to terminate his supervised release judgement under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rutledge, No. 1:04-cr-00321-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 12 & entered Aug. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.