U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Sulyaman Wasalaam v. Christ Young

Sulyaman Wasalaam v. Christ Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 2016

Sulyaman Wasalaam v. Christ Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7512

SULYAMAN WASALAAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRIST YOUNG; DARYL WILLIAMS; SHERIFF RALPH KERSEY; SHERIFF DEPARTMENT AND DETENTION CENTER, Defendant - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:15-cv-00642-WO-LPA)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sulyaman Wasalaam, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sulyaman Wasalaam seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545- (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Wasalaam seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.