Marcus Thomas v. L. Ross

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Marcus Thomas v. L. Ross

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7622

MARCUS D. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

L. ROSS, RN; E. JOHNSON, RN; D. SPIERS, DON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00989-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus D. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marcus D. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically,

we conclude that Thomas has presented no evidence that

Defendants fabricated the documents submitted in support of

their motion for summary judgment and that the district court

did not err in denying Thomas’ motions for appointment of

counsel and to subpoena witnesses. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’

motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Thomas v. Ross, No. 1:13-cv-

00989-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished