U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Hector Portillo

United States v. Hector Portillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 29, 2016

United States v. Hector Portillo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7299

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HECTOR DAVID PORTILLO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:95-cr-00522-LMB-1)

Submitted: January 8, 2016 Decided: January 29, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hector David Portillo, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Hector David Portillo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Portillo, No. 1:95-cr-00522-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. July 7, 2015). We deny Portillo’s motion for summary disposition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.