Stephen Owusu v. Loretta Lynch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Stephen Owusu v. Loretta Lynch, 631 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2016)

Stephen Owusu v. Loretta Lynch

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Kissi Owusu, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider its decision upholding the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion for a continuance and entering an order of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and Owusu’s claims, and find them to be without merit. We accordingly find no abuse of discretion in the denial of reconsideration, see Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009), and deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Owusu (B.I.A. Apr. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Stephen Kissi OWUSU, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished