Ronald Paul v. Paul de Holczer
Ronald Paul v. Paul de Holczer
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2059
RONALD I. PAUL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL D. DE HOLCZER, individually and as a partner of the law firm of Moses, Koon & Brackett, PC; MICHAEL H. QUINN, individually and as senior lawyer of Quinn Law Firm, LLC; J. CHARLES ORMOND, JR., individually and as partner of the Law Firm of Holler, Dennis, Corbett, Ormond, Plante & Garner; OSCAR K. RUCKER, in his individual capacity as Director, Rights of Way South Carolina Department of Transportation; MACIE M. GRESHAM, in her individual capacity as Eastern Region Right of Way Program Manager South Carolina Department of Transportation; NATALIE J. MOORE, in her individual capacity as Assistant Chief Counsel, South Carolina Department of Transportation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-02178-CMC)
Submitted: January 29, 2016 Decided: February 4, 2016
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald I. Paul, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Ronald I. Paul appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint * and the
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend
the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Paul v. de Holczer, No. 3:15-cv-02178-CMC (D.S.C. July
28, 2015 & Sept. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*We conclude we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,
807 F.3d 619, 623-25(4th Cir. 2015) (providing standard).
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished