U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Noe Pineda-Albarron

United States v. Noe Pineda-Albarron
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 1, 2016

United States v. Noe Pineda-Albarron

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NOE PINEDA-ALBARRON, a/k/a Primo, a/k/a Pedro Martinez Flores, a/k/a Noe Albarron-Pineda, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00029-NKM-1)

Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: February 1, 2016

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noe Pineda-Albarron, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Noe Pineda-Albarron appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pineda-Albarron, No. 3:10-cr-00029-NKM- (W.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.