U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

Malcolm Muhammad v. R. Mathena

Malcolm Muhammad v. R. Mathena
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 1, 2016

Malcolm Muhammad v. R. Mathena

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7219

MALCOLM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. R. MATHENA, Warden; J. WARATH, Assistant Warden; A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations; J. OWENS, Property Officer; S. SHORTRIDGE, Mailroom Supervisor; MAJOR GALLAHART, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:14-cv-00142-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: January 21, 2016 Decided: February 1, 2016

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Muhammad v. Mathena, No. 7:14-cv-00142-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. July 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.