United States v. Monique Arp

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 10, 2016

Opinion

No. 15-7593

Plaintiff - Appellee,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1)

Submitted: February 5, 2016 Decided: February 10, 2016

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monique Michelle Arp, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Monique Michelle Arp appeals the district court’s order

denying her

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence

reduction based on U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C,

Amend. 782 (2015). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error because Arp’s sentence was the result of a Fed.

R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement. Arp’s stipulated sentence

was not based on the Sentencing Guidelines, so Amendment 782 does

not apply. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Arp, No. 4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1

(D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.