United States v. Thurman Young

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Thurman Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7422

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THURMAN YOUNG, a/k/a Charlie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-3)

Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: February 11, 2016

Before KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thurman Young, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; Dee Mullarkey Sterling, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thurman Young appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Young, No. 4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 28,

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished