Momolu V.S. Sirleaf v. David Robinson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf v. David Robinson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8022

MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, VDOC, sued individually and in official capacity; C. WALL, Chaplin, GraceInside Chaplin Services, Inc., sued individually and in official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, Magistrate Judge. (3:15-cv-00340-MHL-RCY)

Submitted: February 5, 2016 Decided: February 17, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

order denying his motion for appointment of counsel without

prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders of the district court,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The order Sirleaf seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Sirleaf’s pending

motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished