U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Isaiah Miller

United States v. Isaiah Miller
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2016

United States v. Isaiah Miller

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7421

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ISAIAH MILLER, a/k/a I, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:05-cr-00036-TLW-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaiah Miller, Appellant Pro Se. William Norman Nettles, United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Isaiah Miller appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Miller, No. 4:05-cr-00036-TLW- (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2015). We grant Miller leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his motions for a transcript at government expense and to have a verbatim transcript ordered.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.