United States v. Isaiah Miller

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Isaiah Miller

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7421

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ISAIAH MILLER, a/k/a I,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:05-cr-00036-TLW-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaiah Miller, Appellant Pro Se. William Norman Nettles, United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Isaiah Miller appeals the district court’s order denying

his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Miller, No. 4:05-cr-00036-TLW-

1 (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2015). We grant Miller leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and deny his motions for a transcript at

government expense and to have a verbatim transcript ordered.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished