Malcolm Muhammad v. Chaplain Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Malcolm Muhammad v. Chaplain Jackson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7294

MALCOLM MUHAMMAD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

ERIC L. REID,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHAPLAIN JACKSON,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

EDDIE PEARSON, individually and official capacity; R. WALLACE, individually and official capacity; WENDY S. HOBBS, individually and official capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00339-LO-TCB)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Muhammad v. Reid, No. 1:13-cv-00339-LO-TCB (E.D. Va.

Apr. 24 & July 31, 2013; Aug. 22, 2014; June 30, 2015). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished