U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Yulian Carillo-Tamayo

United States v. Yulian Carillo-Tamayo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2016

United States v. Yulian Carillo-Tamayo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7783

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. YULIAN CARILLO-TAMAYO, a/k/a Frank, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cr-00563-MBS-2)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yulian Carillo-Tamayo, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D. Ragsdale, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Yulian Carillo-Tamayo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carillo-Tamayo, No. 5:12-cr- 00563-MBS-2 (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.