United States v. Carlos Coward

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Carlos Coward

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7565

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CARLOS ERNEST COWARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:07-cr-00069-GEC-3)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Ernest Coward, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carlos Ernest Coward appeals the district court’s order

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct judgment. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Coward, No. 7:07-cr-00069-GEC-3 (W.D.

Va. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished